review of our test shoot:
After going over and watching through the test shoot, it does make sense but it also has a few flaws that we need to change. For example, the ending our main character runs away from some sort of 'creature'. When we looked back at the shoot it didn't really give off the fact that he was being 'chased'. More running away from 'something'. So that is something that we would need to look over to change or morph into something better. For example the change we could make could be the camera coming at him and then a blank screen and screaming, or we do a pov camera shot of the camera following him to portray that stalker like/ creature chase type idea.When looking over the opening scene and the way the narrative works, I think the plot is quite clear. But at times it can get quite repetitive. As mentioned I think the ending is slightly blurry but that can be fixed. But overall the plot is quite clear in the sense that a man goes walking with his dog but they come across a dead body. Its quite ambiguous so allows the audience to have their own perspective and opinion on what they have seen. The scene worked well with the location, and because it was a large forest area it was easier to take establishing shots and longe shots. it made it more effective and brought an element of realism to the location and opening scene.
The things that need to change is definitely the ending as it isn't practical. As well as the dead body, having a dead body is really hard to do and make it realistic. So instead of this we are going to use meat and fake blood to portray the remains of a body. And changing the ending to something more efficient and better quality. with the time limit it does need to be 2 minutes, we did quite well at sticking to the time but was short of 15 seconds. This means extending parts of the clip as we need to make it longer. Within the shoot of it the shots look quite quick and cut at a fast pace. To improve and extend the actual shoot I think extending the shots to make them longer will improve it by far.Looking at the way it engages its audience I felt at times it was a bit repetitive. The one set location makes it quite repetitive but, something like adding in the symbols in the ground as well as the weird piles of rocks etc can interest audiences if we add it in sooner. Adding in the props sooner (like 10 seconds in) can improve the quality and meaning of the scene as well as overall more engaging. And lastly looking at the way tension is created within the scene. We managed to use a variety of high and low angled shots but again too many shots were cut short which is why the opening scene was short. As an editor I made a choice to add a non diegetic soundtrack of creepy music. I felt this was an active way to keep the tension high as well as just generally keeping audiences engaged as again it can get repetitive. The tension was also created by reactions of actors; so as mentioned before I think trying to add more close up shots of our main actors facial expressions will be a good way to connect with our audiences and keep them engaged in what they are watching. Overall I think the test shoot went really well and our idea has been translated efficiently. But I think it definitely helped us identify what we need to change or morph in some way.